Ministry Reports X User for Inciting Violence Against Indians

The Ministry Lodges Report Against X User Over Incendiary Post Targeting Indian Community

The X user called for a repeat of the May 13 incidents and insulted the Indian community, calling them “stupid”

Digital Hatred Under Scrutiny: The Government Takes Decisive Action

In a disturbing development that has reignited discussions around race, freedom of speech, and online extremism in Malaysia, the Ministry of Communications has taken serious steps against a social media user who published a deeply inflammatory post on X (formerly Twitter). The individual reportedly called for violence by suggesting that it was "time to wage war against the Indians." This shocking and hateful rhetoric has raised widespread alarm and condemnation from civil society, government representatives, and netizens across the country. According to Communications Minister Datuk Seri Aaron Ago Dagang, the Ministry has formally lodged a police report against the user. The post not only incited racial hatred but disturbingly referenced the tragic May 13 racial riots—a black mark in Malaysian history—in an apparent call to repeat such violence. "We take this matter seriously. Any incitement to racial violence is unacceptable and will be investigated thoroughly," said the Minister during a media briefing.

What Was Said: The Shocking Message on Social Media

The X user, whose identity has not yet been officially released, made a post that included the following:

• A direct call to "wage war against the Indians"
• Reference to the May 13 incidents as a model to emulate
• Use of the derogatory term "stupid" to describe the Indian community

These remarks are being interpreted as clear attempts to stir racial animosity and outrage online. The situation is highly sensitive due to Malaysia’s multiethnic makeup and history of racial tensions.

The Weight of May 13

The reference to May 13—referring to the 1969 racial riots in Kuala Lumpur which led to hundreds of deaths and had a profound effect on Malaysian society—makes the case particularly incendiary. "This is not just a mean-spirited attack on a community, but a literal invocation of past bloodshed," said a political analyst who wished to remain anonymous.

How Authorities Are Responding

Following the publication of the offensive tweet, the Ministry acted quickly:

• A police report was filed by the Communications Ministry
• The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has opened an investigation under communications laws
• The case could fall under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (Section 233) which prohibits content “obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person”

Minister Aaron affirmed that the use of social platforms to incite hatred—no matter the target—will not be tolerated. "We have already submitted necessary documentation, and an investigation will take place immediately. We must uphold the harmony of our nation," he said.

Public Backlash and Civil Society Reactions

News of the hateful post and the subsequent government action has sparked a broad spectrum of reactions:

• Support for firm government action in tackling hate speech
• Outrage at the user’s inflammatory language and dangerous rhetoric
• Calls for faster detection and response to hateful content on social platforms

Organizations such as SUARAM and The Malaysian Bar have also weighed in, urging stricter enforcement of laws pertaining to hate speech and racial incitement. Many believe stronger monitoring tools and partnerships with tech companies can help prevent such incidents from gaining traction online.

X (formerly Twitter) Under Fire, Again

The global platform X is no stranger to controversy, especially under its current leadership. Critics have frequently accused it of being a breeding ground for misinformation and extremism due to its perceived lax enforcement of community standards. In Malaysia, the platform has become a hotspot for political debates, personal attacks, and now, it seems, dangerous racial provocations. The question now is: Are X’s moderation practices sufficient to safeguard against racial extremism? The Malaysian government may now be considering stricter regulatory oversight over digital platforms.

The Need for Digital Citizenship Education

Experts have pointed out the urgent need for digital literacy and ethics education among Malaysians, particularly among younger netizens. It’s one thing to exercise freedom of speech—but quite another to exploit it to incite violence or hatred. Civic advocates are calling on:

• Schools to integrate digital responsibility in their curricula
• Parents to have discussions with their children about respecting all communities
• Government to launch national awareness campaigns on tolerance and unity

Rising Ethno-Religious Tensions and Political Responsibilities

Although Minister Aaron has stressed the non-partisan nature of the Ministry’s actions, the incident comes amid a politically charged environment in the country. With racial rhetoric making its way into political discourse over recent months, civil society has been urging leaders across the spectrum to exercise restraint. This case acts as a reminder that division serves no Malaysian interest, especially when external social platforms amplify voices that thrive on hate. "The onus is not only on the government to regulate but on political leaders to set the tone and reject all forms of racism publicly and consistently," said a social activist from the group Malaysians Against Racial Extremism.

The Legal Path Ahead

Legal experts suggest that if prosecuted under the Communications and Multimedia Act or Sedition Act, the user could face:

• Fines up to RM50,000
• Up to one year in prison
• Or both

Some quarters are advocating for even harsher sentences for racial instigators online, including permanent bans and jail time without parole. Others urge caution, warning that freedom of expression and human rights must also be balanced in any new policies considered.

Conclusion: Zero Tolerance for Intolerance

The Ministry’s swift action against the incendiary post is a strong signal that Malaysia will not allow hate speech to go unchecked—especially when it threatens to reignite historical wounds. In a digitally interconnected era, posts on social media can have very real consequences in the physical world. This incident should serve as a wake-up call—not only for the public, but for platform providers, policymakers, and community leaders alike. Strengthening multiracial harmony is a continuous effort—and it begins with rejecting hate in every form, especially the kind that calls for war over unity. Stay updated with The Vibes Blog for more developments on this story.